About Electromagnetic Surface Protection
Why Use A Corrosion Module?
(Video)
How Our Technology
Works
Testing Information
Warranty Info
Frequently Asked Questions
Federal Competition
Bureau Notice
See For Yourself!
 
 
 

 

 
Test Summaries
Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4

Test 1 - CCT Laboratories

Type of Test: Salt Spray over the scribed area only. Test was done to show the efficiency of the Final Coat Electronic Corrosion Module over a surface in the absence of an electrolyte (moisture) film and it’s ability to reduce the rate of corrosion.

Test Panel Size: 4 feet x 3 feet
Test Results: ”the corrosion rate is reduced by 99.7% by the Module on the Test Panel compared with the Control Panel. Even if the difference in the corrosion potential is reduced to -0.100V, the ratio (CR) test/ (CR) control = 0.0204 and hence the corrosion ratio is reduced by 98%. To put these numbers in perspective, imagine that a system (automobile) fails by corrosion without the Module in a time of 1 year. If the Module is attached, the failure time would be 343 years if the potential is displaced by 150mV in the negative direction, and 49 years if the potential was displaced by only 100mV. Such results are particularly significant when one considers that the average life of a vehicle is in the order of 10 years. Accordingly, these calculations demonstrate that the reduction in corrosion rate is substantial and that the Module is an effective corrosion control device”.

Note: The corrosion potentials measured at the scribes on both panels were approximately the same until times exceeding 60 hours. The potentials then diverged, with that for the test panel eventually becoming more negative than that for the control panel by about 150mV, indicating that an induction time exists for the
Corrosion Module 2000 to exert corrosion control.